No Broker Averages
Why true benchmarking requires independent data, not internal broker averages.
Why We Don’t Use Broker Book-of-Business Averages
We get asked this a lot: “Why not just use broker data?”
Here’s the Short Answer
It’s not benchmarking — it’s self-referencing.
Book-of-business averages are:
- Limited to a single firm’s client base
- Often outdated or incomplete
- Not industry- or size-filterable
They reflect what one brokerage happens to sell, not what the market offers.
What We Do Instead
At Bnchmrk, we source validated plan-level data from:
- Consultant networks
- Employer surveys
- API-connected benefit platforms
Then we run it through a multi-stage QA process: screening for structure, validating logic, flagging anomalies, and cross-checking source integrity.
Why It Matters
Your recommendations should be based on facts — not folklore.
True benchmarking means comparing against a real, representative sample of the market. It gives you:
- Credibility when defending decisions
- Confidence when navigating plan design
- Clarity when something looks “off” compared to market norms
The result? Independent, representative benchmarks — not internal feedback loops.
If your data is just recycled from your own client base, you’re not benchmarking. You’re echoing.
And your clients deserve better.
About Andrew Kimmel
Former benefits consultant who saw the need for better benchmarking tools. Led analytics at NFP, a national benefits consulting firm, before founding Bnchmrk in 2016.